

By MYDORGE, Claude First complete edition of Mydorge's work on conic sections, intended to provide the geometrical basis for the study of optics (books I & II had been published in 1631). Mydorge's work on conic sections contains hundreds of problems published for the first time, as well as a multitude of ingenious and original methods that later... moreBy MYDORGE, Claude
First complete edition of Mydorge's work on conic sections, intended to provide the geometrical basis for the study of optics (books I & II had been published in 1631). Mydorge's work on conic sections contains hundreds of problems published for the first time, as well as a multitude of ingenious and original methods that later geometers frequently used, usually without citing their source . . . In his study of conic sections Mydorge continued the work of Apollonius, whose methods of proof he refined and simplified . . . Mydorge asserts that if from a given point in the plane of a conic section radii to the points of the curve are drawn and extended in a given relationship, then their extremities will be on a new conic section similar to the first. This statement constitutes the beginnings of an extremely fruitful method of deforming figures; it was successfully used by La Hire and Newton, and later by Poncelet and, especially, by Chasles, who named it 'deformation homographique'. Mydorge posed and solved the following problem in [book] III: On a given cone place a given conic section a problem that Apollonius had solved only for a right cone. Mydorge was also interested in geometric methods used in approximate construction, such as that of a regular heptagon. Another problem that Mydorge solved by approximation, although he did not clearly indicate his method, was that of transforming a square into an equivalent regular polygon possessing an arbitrary number of sides" (DSB). Mydorge (15851647) belonged to one of France's most illustrious families. "Like Fermat, he belonged to that elite group of seventeenthcentury scientists who pursued science as amateurs but nevertheless made contributions of the greatest importance to one or more fields of knowledge" (ibid.). "In 1625 Mydorge met Descartes, and they became firm friends and scientific collaborators. As Schuster has shown, in the following year Descartes and Mydorge almost certainly succeeded in formulating the mathematical law of refraction" (Sasaki, Descartes Mathematical Thought, p. 175). He was also a friend of Fermat and Mersenne, and in 1638 played a role in settling the dispute between Descartes and Fermat that had arisen when Fermat refuted Descartes 'Dioptrique'. Publication of the work was sponsored by Sir Charles Cavendish (?15951654), to whom the book is dedicated. Cavendish seems to have developed contacts with foreign mathematicians and by the summer of 1631 was corresponding with Mydorge. In 1671 John Collins wrote "they complaine in France (as we doe here) that their Booksellers will not undertake to print mathematicall Bookes there, thence it came to passe that the four latter books of Mydorge were never printed, as the former had not been unless Sir Charles Cavendish had given 50 crownes as a Dowry with it" (Collins to Gregory, 14 March 1671/2 in Newton, Correspondence, 47). The manuscript of "the four latter books" was apparently taken to England by Cavendish's brother William and Thomas Wriothesley, Earl of Southampton, and then lost. The first four books were reissued in 1641 and 1660, and under the title 'De sectionibus conicis' were included by Mersenne in his 'Universae geometriae' (1644). Like most copies (e.g., Macclesfield and de Vitry), this copy lacks the leaf of dedication to Cavendish. Albert et al. 1636; B. O. A. C. P. 72; Macclesfield 1507. Folio, pp. [vi], 308, [2, errata, signed D. A. L. G.], woodcut printer's device on title and numerous woodcut diagrams in text (moderate browning). Contemporary limp vellum.
Published by: Paris: Jean Dedin, 1639
Vendor: Landmarks of Science Books
